Court largely upholds North Dakota law regulating PBMs

I show You how To Make Huge Profits In A Short Time With Cryptos!

A federal appeals court has largely upheld a North Dakota law aimed at regulating companies that are hired to hold down prescription costs for insurers and employers

BISMARCK, N.D. — A federal appeals court has largely upheld a North Dakota law aimed at regulating companies that are hired to hold down prescription costs for insurers and employers.

A three-judge panel of the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled on Wednesday, reversing its earlier decision. The state law provides oversight of pharmacy benefit managers, including barring gag rules that limit what pharmacists can discuss with their patients such as telling them of cheaper drug alternatives.

A trade group representing pharmacy benefit managers filed a federal lawsuit in 2017 challenging the North Dakota law that sought oversight on the managers and required disclosure of some financial information.

The federal appeals court later ruled North Dakota law regulating pharmacy benefit managers is preempted by federal law. The case was sent back to the appeals court after the U.S. Supreme Court upheld a similar Arkansas law late last year that said federal law doesn’t prevent states from regulating reimbursement rates.

A coalition of attorneys general from nearly three dozen states and several pharmacy associations signed an amicus brief supporting North Dakota’s law aimed at regulating pharmacy benefit managers.

North Dakota Attorney General Wayne Stenehjem, a Republican, told The Associated Press that the appeals court ruling means the state is now able to enforce its law that “will curb the abusive practices of some PBMs.” Stenehjem said the law is intended to provide people with better access to medications at lower cost.

For example, he said, North Dakota’s law prohibits forcing patients from using PBM-controlled, mail-order pharmacies.

The Pharmaceutical Care Management Association, which challenged the North Dakota law, said in a statement Friday it was “disappointed with the court’s ruling.”

The attorneys general that supported North Dakota’s case are from Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, the District of Columbia, Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Indiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota Mississippi, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Oregon, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia and Washington.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*